next »

[yummyyam]

Hello, I am using WinFlip on my laptop, and have a problem as my anti-aliasing cannot be set beyond 0.
Because of this, the quality is rather poor, unlike the screens i have seen. :O

I am using a Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family graphics Accelerator, Windows Vista Home Basic,2 gigs RAM and 1.8ghz processor speed.

[koji]

Hi yummyyam

Welcome to WinFlip MessageBoard !

Hello, I am using WinFlip on my laptop, and have a problem as my anti-aliasing cannot be set beyond 0.
Because of this, the quality is rather poor, unlike the screens i have seen. :O

I am using a Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family graphics Accelerator, Windows Vista Home Basic,2 gigs RAM and 1.8ghz processor speed.

Oh, I'm sorry. Currently I don't have the Vista machine. I can't check your problem.
(And, WinFlip does not support Vista officialy.)
WinFlip detects automatically Anti-Aliasing function on your machine's graphic card.
So If the menu of Anti-Aliasing level is all disabled except "0" It means WinFlip couldn't detect Anti-Aliasing function on your machine.

But normaly, WinFlip(0.36 or later) draws the window's border smoothly even if the machine does not have the Anti-Aliasing function.(You must set texture quality to 3 or greator)

WinFlip 0.35 or previous(Anti-alias 0, Texture quality 3 or greater)


WinFlip 0.36 or later(Anti-Alias 0, Texture quality 3 or greater)


Cheers,
Koji

[yummyyam]

Hi koji,
This is my screenshot of winflip.
it is set at anti-aliasing 0, texture quality 5.
The quality's rather poor, i think is because i'm using a intel GMA instead of a nvidia GPU XD

[Roman]

    Hi yummyyam, hi Koji,

the overall graphics quality rendered by WinFlip depends much on Texture Quality, less on Antialiasoning.

I am a Vista user too. Setting Texture quality to 3 and Antialiasoning value to 0, I have a very decent quality, with all details clearly drawn (here is WinFlipVista screenshot I took a few days ago with TQ 3 and Antialiasoning 0 or 2 )

The jaggy edges on your screenshot could be due to low resolution of the screenshot itself. Try setting various texture quality values + change "Display size" to "Small". This way you can achieve good graphics.

And I965 GPU should not be much worse than GeForce.     

[koji]

Hi yummyyam again

Thanks for the screenshot. now I can see the problem.
Could you try to set the texture quality to "3" if you've never tried yet.
Some of graphic card supports only "1" and "3".

Cheers,
Koji.

[koji]

Hi All

Is there any one who has got I965 GPU(Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family graphics Accelerator) on your machine?
If your machine has this GPU, please provide us the information about this problem.

Thank you in advance.

Cheers,
Koji

[yummyyam]

Hi All,
I've set my texture quality to 3,
and its much better now! Thank You!

[senhaku]

Some of graphic card supports only "1" and "3".

I see, no wonder when texture quality is set to 6 (High), it's worse than 3 (*Normal).